How are jobs changing?
An expensive item isn't necessarily a "bad" purchase if it provides immense value (like a home). The real financial drain comes from expenses that have a high cost but offer disproportionately low or fleeting value in return.
Based on typical spending habits, here are the expense categories that often have the worst cost-to-value ratio.
This is arguably the single biggest area where people spend excessively for diminishing returns.
The High Cost: A new car loses a significant portion of its value—often 15-25%—the moment you drive it off the dealership floor. This is called depreciation. Over the first three years, it can lose up to 50% of its initial price. You're also paying for higher insurance premiums and financing costs (interest) on a much larger capital amount.
The Low Value Offered: What does a R600 000 new car offer that a R300 000, two-year-old version of the same car doesn't? The primary value of a car is reliable transportation. Both provide this. The extra R300 000 buys you that "new car smell," a few marginal feature updates, and the temporary status of having the latest model. This status and novelty have a very short lifespan, but the financial impact of the purchase lasts for years.
The Smarter Alternative: Buying a reliable, well-maintained used car that is 2-4 years old. You avoid the steepest part of the depreciation curve, your insurance will be lower, and you get nearly the same utility for a fraction of the cost.
While enjoyable, the convenience of not cooking comes at a steep price.
The High Cost: A meal at a mid-range restaurant in Cape Town for two can easily cost R500-R700. A single takeaway meal can be R150-R250. Doing this several times a week adds up to thousands of Rands per month.
The Low Value Offered: The value is convenience and ambiance. However, the cost is often 3-5 times higher than making a comparable, and often healthier, meal at home. For that multiple, the value proposition quickly diminishes, especially when it becomes a routine rather than a special occasion. You are paying a massive premium for labour and service.
The Smarter Alternative: Master a few simple, quick, and delicious recipes. Meal prep on weekends to make weeknight cooking faster. Treat dining out as a deliberate, occasional event to be savoured, not a default option.
This is an expense that offers negative value. You are paying extra money for something that no longer exists or has been used up.
The High Cost: When you buy a R1 000 pair of sneakers on a credit card with an interest rate of 21% per annum and only make the minimum payment, you could end up paying hundreds of Rands in interest over time. The final cost of the item becomes far greater than its sticker price.
The Low Value Offered: The item (like a fancy meal, clothing, or a holiday) provided temporary enjoyment. The debt, however, provides ongoing stress and financial drag. You are essentially paying a penalty for past consumption, which severely hampers your ability to save for the future.
The Smarter Alternative: Use a "save up first" principle. If you want something, save the cash for it. Use credit cards as a transaction tool, not a financing one, and pay the balance in full every month.
The "death by a thousand cuts" expense. Individually small, they collectively create a significant financial drain.
The High Cost: That R150/month streaming service you haven't watched in months, the R500/month gym membership you use twice a month, or the premium app subscription you forgot you had. These auto-renewing payments can easily add up to over R1,000 a month without you noticing.
The Low Value Offered: The value is theoretical. You could use the service, but you don't. You are paying for access, not for actual usage or enjoyment. The cost is constant, but the value you derive is close to zero.
The Smarter Alternative: Conduct a monthly "subscription audit." Go through your bank statements, identify all recurring payments, and be ruthless. If you aren't getting significant value from it, cancel it. You can always sign up again if you miss it.
Paying a premium for marginal upgrades is a classic low-value trap.
The High Cost: A brand-new flagship smartphone can cost upwards of R30 000. A one-year-old model with 95% of the same functionality might cost R18 000.
The Low Value Offered: Is a slightly better camera or a fractionally faster processor worth an extra R12 000? For the vast majority of users, the answer is no. The core functions—calling, messaging, browsing the internet, apps—are virtually identical. You are paying a massive premium simply to be on the cutting edge.
The Smarter Alternative: Buy last year's tech model or a mid-range device. The performance is more than sufficient for most people's needs, and the savings are enormous.
In summary, the worst expenses are those driven by a desire for immediate convenience, temporary status, or passive consumption, where the long-term financial cost far outweighs the fleeting benefit received.